| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/10/1992 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/10/2004 |
|
Autoria: |
FLECK, N. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Cx. P. 776, Porto Alegre, RS. 90000. Brazil. |
|
Título: |
Evaluation of pre-emergence herbicides and their combinations in sunflower. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1985 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONFERENCIA INTERNACIONAL DE GIRASOL, 11., 1985. Mar del Plata. Actas. Mar del Plata:ASAGIR/ISA, 1985. |
|
Volume: |
t.2 |
|
Páginas: |
p.497-502. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
During the 1983/84 growing season it was conducted a field experiment in Guaiba, RS, Brazil, in order to evaluate the efficiency of pre-emergence herbicides and their combinations for weed control in sunflower. The herbicide treatments evaluated were 2-chloro-2', 6-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide (alachlor; 3600 g/ha), 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (chloramben; 2250 g/ha), 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron; 750 g/ha), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2methoxy-1-methylethyl)-acetamide (metolachlor; 2160 g/ha), and 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (prometryn; 1920 g/ha) and also the combinations of alachlor or metolachlor with chloramben, linuron or prometryn, when the rates were reduced by 1/3 of thoseapplied individually. The most efficient herbicide treatment, equivalent to the weed-free check, was the combination of metolachlor + prometryn; however, it did not differ from alachlor + prometryn, alachlor + chloramben, and alachlor alone. Linuron, prometryn, and chloramben were the treatments that presented the lowest herbicide efficiency due to their defficient grass weed control. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Avaliacao; Brasil; Evaluation; Herbicide; Planta daninha; Pre-emergence; Pre-emergente; Rio Grande do Sul; Sunflower; Weed. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Químico; Girassol; Herbicida. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Brazil; chemical control. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02022naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1452382
005 2004-10-28
008 1985 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFLECK, N. G.
245 $aEvaluation of pre-emergence herbicides and their combinations in sunflower.
260 $c1985
300 $a p.497-502. t.2
490 $vt.2
520 $aDuring the 1983/84 growing season it was conducted a field experiment in Guaiba, RS, Brazil, in order to evaluate the efficiency of pre-emergence herbicides and their combinations for weed control in sunflower. The herbicide treatments evaluated were 2-chloro-2', 6-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide (alachlor; 3600 g/ha), 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (chloramben; 2250 g/ha), 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron; 750 g/ha), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2methoxy-1-methylethyl)-acetamide (metolachlor; 2160 g/ha), and 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (prometryn; 1920 g/ha) and also the combinations of alachlor or metolachlor with chloramben, linuron or prometryn, when the rates were reduced by 1/3 of thoseapplied individually. The most efficient herbicide treatment, equivalent to the weed-free check, was the combination of metolachlor + prometryn; however, it did not differ from alachlor + prometryn, alachlor + chloramben, and alachlor alone. Linuron, prometryn, and chloramben were the treatments that presented the lowest herbicide efficiency due to their defficient grass weed control.
650 $aBrazil
650 $achemical control
650 $aControle Químico
650 $aGirassol
650 $aHerbicida
653 $aAvaliacao
653 $aBrasil
653 $aEvaluation
653 $aHerbicide
653 $aPlanta daninha
653 $aPre-emergence
653 $aPre-emergente
653 $aRio Grande do Sul
653 $aSunflower
653 $aWeed
773 $tIn: CONFERENCIA INTERNACIONAL DE GIRASOL, 11., 1985. Mar del Plata. Actas. Mar del Plata:ASAGIR/ISA, 1985.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/01/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
YAMANAKA, N.; LEMOS, N. G.; AKAMATSU, H.; YAMAOKA, Y.; SILVA, D. C. G.; PASSIANOTTO, A. L. de L.; ABDELNOOR, R. V.; SOARES, R. M.; SUENAGA, K. |
|
Afiliação: |
NAOKI YAMANAKA, JIRCAS; NOELLE G. LEMOS, JIRCAS; HAJIME AKAMATSU, JIRCAS; YUICHI YAMAOKA, University of Tsukuba; DANIELLE CRISTINA GREGORIO DA SILVA, CNPSO; ANDRÉ L. de L. PASSIANOTTO, CNPSo; RICARDO VILELA ABDELNOOR, CNPSO; RAFAEL MOREIRA SOARES, CNPSO; KAZUHIRO SUENAGA, JIRCAS. |
|
Título: |
Soybean breeding materials useful for resistance to soybean rust in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, Tsukuba, v. 45, n. 4, p. 385-395, 2011. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Thesagro: |
Melhoramento genético vegetal; Soja; Variedade resistente. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Disease resistance; Plant breeding; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00805naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1911796
005 2013-02-25
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aYAMANAKA, N.
245 $aSoybean breeding materials useful for resistance to soybean rust in Brazil.
260 $c2011
650 $aDisease resistance
650 $aPlant breeding
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aMelhoramento genético vegetal
650 $aSoja
650 $aVariedade resistente
700 1 $aLEMOS, N. G.
700 1 $aAKAMATSU, H.
700 1 $aYAMAOKA, Y.
700 1 $aSILVA, D. C. G.
700 1 $aPASSIANOTTO, A. L. de L.
700 1 $aABDELNOOR, R. V.
700 1 $aSOARES, R. M.
700 1 $aSUENAGA, K.
773 $tJapan Agricultural Research Quarterly, Tsukuba$gv. 45, n. 4, p. 385-395, 2011.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
